Latest news
  1. Oceania Athletics Championships 2022 – Mackay, Australia
  2. Continental Tour 2022: Oceania
  3. World Athletics Veteran Pin
  4. Brian Roe – World Athletics Plaque of Merit
  5. Once-in-a-Lifetime Games; Privileged to be a Technical Official 
  6. Flack, Snell, Doubell … Peter Bol?
  7. Oceania Identified Athlete from Tuvalu makes Olympic Debut
  8. Oceania Athletics Tokyo2020 Event Previews
  9. Jonah Harris on Track to Create Nauru History
  10. Global Conversation
  12. Oceania One Day Meetings 2020-21
  13. Cook Islands Games
  14. World Athletics – Wrap Up
  15. Lauren Bruce Claims Area Hammer Throw Record
  16. McSweyn Area Record
  17. Project W.I.N: HPTC Athletes take on Nutrition
  18. Area Record Holder Announces Retirement
  20. Alex Beddoes: Sportsmen of the Year
  22. Ratcliffe Sets New Area Record at Porritt Classic
  23. Oceania 20km Race Walk Championships
  24. Fiji’s Sprinter, Heleina Young, Awarded Inaugural Scholarship
  25. Tokyo Qualifiers, Records, and GIO OzDay10k
  26. Hull and Baxter Set New Area Records
  27. Palau: 4th Annual Koror Kolor Run
  28. Maurie Plant: Tributes and Memories
  29. 2020 Melanesian Championships: New Location
  30. NMA 38th Annual Christmas Island Relay
  31. Congratulations to newly elected OAA President Robin Sapong Eugenio of the Northen Mariana Islands
  32. McSweyn claims Zatopek 10,000m Victory in Record Time
  33. Sir Peter Snell, a New Zealand Athletic Legend who Always be Remembered
  34. Day 9 & 10: Doha Report
  35. Doha Report: Day 8
  36. Doha Day 7: Report
  37. Doha Report: Day 6
  38. Doha Report: Day 3
  39. Doha – Day Two
  40. Day 1: Competition Begins
  41. Press Release: 2021 OCEANIA AREA CHAMPIONSHIPS
  42. Sally Pearson, one of Australia’s greatest Olympians, has announced her retirement. 
  43. Oceania Athletics Council 2019-2023
  44. Oceania Cup 2023
  45. Athlete Profile: Banuve Tabakaucoro FIJI
  46. Athlete Profile: ‘Ata Maama Tu’utafaiva TONGA
  47. Athlete Profile: Isila Apkup PNG
  48. Pacific Mini Games Award Recipients

Throwing Cage Safety and Selection

Throwing Cage Safety and Selection


Written by Denis Wilson & Graham Dwight

Existing Cages

Many of the older cages installed in Australia were purchased from overseas and are not designed for the netting to remain in place after the completion of a competition or a training session.

World Athletics, since requiring more information from manufacturers seeking a Product Certificate for their cage, has found that some cages in fact have quite low design wind speeds. World Athletics has now determined that cages that are to be used for major international competitions shall have a design wind speed of 15m/s or greater. World Athletics is granting product certificates for cages with a design wind speed less than 15m/s but all new cages are to have a plaque attached to it stating the design wind speed at which the cage netting must be lowered. It is also recommended that at each ground there be a plan which indicates the danger zone for each cage so that users are aware of the need to prevent other activities within the danger zone when the cage is being used.

Even a PlayHard Thor 10 or Thor 9 cage, which has a design wind speed of 100kph (28m/s) located in southern Australia let alone the cyclone prone tropics, must have the netting lowered on the cage if there is a violent storm forecast. Please note that the Thor 9 cage with a smaller footprint but wider gates has an IAAF Product certificate because its danger zone meets World Athletics requirements thus can be used for all competitions.

The minimum design gust wind speed for permanent structures designed by ultimate limit state analysis is 30m/s in southern Australia but local conditions with extreme exposure may warrant a higher design wind speed.

It is therefore suggested that there should be appropriate instructions promulgated at each venue when the cage netting must be lowered so as to protect the investment.

New Cages

Before purchasing a new cage determine how you want to operate and maintain[1] the cage.

Hammer cages with metal framed gates are not recommended as the gates and their netting are very prone to damage from hammers, the gates are often very difficult to move particularly in a strong wind and if not locked firmly in the open or closed position can swing around and demolish a cage. Further some gates are unstable in strong winds.

There are some designs with top-hung netting gates or sliding netting gates available.

Can the cage structure stay in place permanently? If not, how will the cage structure be installed or removed quickly without heavy lifting equipment?

The posts can either be installed in sockets set into the post footings2 or attached to a fixed or hinged baseplate set into the footing2. The latter may be the better solution.

If a cage structure can remain in place then a cage with posts permanently set into the footings would be acceptable. However, note that the posts are longer and heavier, and accurately placing them plus keeping them vertical during footing concreting may be difficult.

Determine the make(s) of cage which meet your operational requirements with the design wind speed which meets your requirements and select the appropriate-sized footing[2] for the soil conditions existing at your site.[3]

If possible, have the cage supplier also install the required footings.

In selecting a cage, the cheapest price for supply of the cage should not be the determinant. Have a rating system for all the desirable properties. Examine an existing cage of the type and talk to its users.

Desirable Properties

The IAAF has listed the following desirable properties of a cage as:

        –   The cage structure and the netting meet the dimension requirements of the IAAF Rules*.

        –   The netting cord is strong enough so that it does not break under the impact of the implement, abrade where it is attached or deteriorate unduly under the effects of ultra violet ray exposure*.

        –   The net can be quickly raised and lowered*.

        –   There is positive attachment of the netting at ground level which maintains the net in correct relationship to the throwing circle(s) particularly in windy conditions and there is sufficient netting at ground level so that an implement cannot penetrate under the netting*[4].

        –   The netting when blown by wind does not impede the athlete making a throw*.[5]

        –   The gate pivot posts and any gate metal frame is not be exposed so that it can be hit by an implement causing damage to both.

        –   The netting is hung clear of the support posts by at least 0.60m and arranged so that when the gate is closed that the posts are not struck by a thrown implement*.

        –   The volume of netting needs to be sufficient to minimise rebound of implements but not slack enough to allow implements to push netting against the supporting structure.*

        –   The gates are easy to open and close manually quickly with a positive positioning arrangement in the fully open and closed positions.

        –   The leading edge of the gate netting must maintain a vertical line in order to maintain the integrity of the danger zone. This means that a tensioning of the leading edge will generally be required at each anchor point i.e. open and closed position.*

        –   The gates maintain their integrity under long term usage.

        –   The supporting frame is stiff enough so that it does not deflect out of position unduly under the weight of the net and the force of wind*.

        –   The cage is easy to install and remove preferably without heavy lifting equipment*.

        –   The cage structure does not unduly block the spectator view of the track events when the netting is lowered*.

        –   Maintenance procedures required to maintain the safety of cage before, during and after competition must be provided. The users and maintenance staff should be regularly reminded of these procedures

* These properties also apply to a stand-alone discus cage

Denis Wilson & Graham Dwight

Updated November 2020

[1] Selection of cage type will also depend upon:

  • Security of site
  • Accessibility of public/unsupervised users
  • How cage and netting is to be maintained
  • Potential for damage e.g.; fire risk (nearness of vegetation), vandalism, misuse by users

Use of chain wire instead of cord netting could be a considered as an alternative particularly for training venues.

[2] For both poles and anchor points. A soil analysis is desirable to ensure that the footings are properly sized.

[3] See Note 2.

[4] Preferably a minimum of 30cm adequately anchored.

[5] At no time should netting be tied to the cage superstructure.